Vertical social housing on the northern border of Mexico: Criteria for sustainable densification

Authors

Abstract

This paper analyzes six vertical social housing developments built in Ciudad Juárez over three periods –1950s-1970s, 1980s and 1990s: FOVISSTE Burocrata (1956), FOVISSTE Sur (1975), FOVISSTE Chamizal (1980-1984), INFONAVIT Casas Grandes (1980s), INFONAVIT Eco2000 (1992-1993) and INFONAVIT Solidaridad (1990-1993.) This research conducts a physical-spatial analysis at two different scales: one, the urban-territorial dimension, which refers to the location of land suitable for urban densification within the urban sprawl, and; two, the urban-community dimension, which is associated with housing developments and the percentage of vacant dwellings. Geostatistical data are included to examine the extent to which these vertical developments favor habitability and sustainability both in location and design terms. This paper also offers a series of strategies intended to transform these dense developments into more balanced communities with the capacity to meet local needs. The final section provides conclusions on density criteria in favor of vertical housing and offers elements that may enable future developments to create inhabitable communities.

Author Biographies

Marisol Rodríguez Sosa, Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez

School of Architecture, Institute of Architecture, Design and Arts, Autonomous University of Ciudad Juarez

Erick Sánchez Flores, Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez

School of Architecture, Institute of Architecture, Design and Arts, Autonomous University of Ciudad Juarez

Gabriel García Moreno, Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez

School of Architecture, Institute of Architecture, Design and Arts, Autonomous University of Ciudad Juarez

References

Berke, P.R., Godschalk, D.R., Kaiser, E.J., y Rodríguez, D.A. (2006). Urban land use planning (5a. ed.). Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Duany, A., Speck, J., y Lydon, M. (2010). The smart growth manual. New York: McGraw Hill.
Hagan, S. (2015). Ecological urbanism: the nature of the city. Londres: Taylor & Francis.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía [INEGI]. (2010). Censo de población vivienda. Aguascalientes, AGS, México: Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía.
Le Corbusier. (2009). Urbanismo. São Paulo: WMF Martins Fontes.
Marsh, W.M. y Grossa, J.M. (1996). Environmental geography. Science, land use, and earth systems (3a. ed.). New York: Wiley.
Maycotte, E. y Sánchez, E. (2010). Ciudades dispersas, viviendas abandonadas: La política de vivienda y su impacto territorial y social en las ciudades mexicanas. ACE: Architecture, city and environment, 5(14), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.5821/ace.v5i14.2503
Mumford, E. (2002). The CIAM discourses on urbanism, 1928-1960. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Reglas de operación del programa de acceso al financiamiento para soluciones habitacionales, del ejercicio fiscal 2016. (2015). Diario Oficial de la Federación, 29 de diciembre de 2015.
Rodríguez, M., Morales, S., y Curiel, M. (2015). Áreas centrales (des)habitadas en Ciudad Juárez: densidad habitacional, seguridad urbana y uso del espacio público. En A. González y M. Rodríguez, Patrimonio arquitectónico y urbano. Paisaje cultural y diseño urbano (pp. 85-100). Ciudad Juárez: Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez.
Sánchez, E., Maycotte, E., y Chávez, J. (2016). Spatial patterns of social mobility perception derived from access to social housing in a Mexican border city. Proceedings International Congress Virtual Cities and Territories, Barcelona, 11, 1326-1345.
Sánchez, E. y Rodríguez, M. (2017). Spatial suitability for urban sustainable densification in a borderland city. Journal of Geography and Regional Planning, 10(10), 266-277. https://doi.org/10.5897/JGRP2017.0648